MCCU AGM, 18 June 2006,  2.30pm

at the Syston & District Social Club, High St. Syston

Agenda:

1) Apologies

2) Minutes of the MCCU Half Year General Meeting

2.1) Accuracy
2.2) Matters Arising.

3) Address of the President.

4) Reports:
4.1) Chairman,
4.2) Chief Executive
4.3) Secretary (vacant)
4.4) Finance Director
4.5) Director for Junior Chess
4.6) Grading Director. (Vacant)
4.7) Events Director
4.8) Public Relations Director, (Vacant).
4.9) County Teams

4.10) Correspondence Chess:
      4.10.1) Individual Event
      4.10.2) Team Event
4.11) MCCU Webmaster

4.12) ECF
4.13) Non-executives

5) Elections:
5.1) President
5.2) Chairman
5.3) Chief Executive
5.4) Secretary
5.5) Finance Director
5.6) Director for Junior Chess
5.7) Director for Grading
5.8) Director for Events
5.9) Director for Public Relations
5.10) Webmaster
5.11) ECF Delegates (max.2)
5.12) Non-executives (max.2)

 

6) Appointment of the Auditor.

7) Levy for 2006/7, Finance Director.

8) MCCU Constitution – Proposals from the Chief Executive Officer

a) That all references to the BCF be replaced by ECF.

b) That a new item be added

Officers may claim expenses properly incurred in the execution of their duties, but must do so within 6 mths of the financial year end in which they are incurred. Claims must be supported by relevant evidence, individual items below £15 may be accepted without additional documentation, provided that the Finance Director is satisfied they have been properly incurred.

8) MCCU County Teams' Tournament Rules – proposals from the Chief Executive Officer  a) ,b)& c) , & from Events Director d)

a) i)That all references in the County rules to BCF be amended to read ECF.

   ii) That all references to assistant secretary be replaced by controller.

b) That rule 13 be amended as follows –

If a third MCCU entry into the ECF national stages is required, the losing semi-finalists shall play off for that place. If the 3rd place match has not been played by the ECF entry deadline,, the County with the best losing score in the Semi-Finals shall become MCCU 3.

The current rule is as follows

13.  ……..

If a third MCCU entry into the BCF national stages is required, the County with the best losing score in the MCCU Semi-finals shall become MCCU 3.

This proposal is being made on behalf of 2 county captains. They are aware that matter has been discussed before, but views may have changed. They feel that the current situation may not lead to the 3 best teams going forward. The reference to a fall back situation reflects a similar fall back in the rules if the Final is not played by 31st March. Whilst we can schedule Final & play off matches before the deadline, we need a fall back in case unforeseen circumstances prevent a match taking place.

c) The CEO proposed that in order to clarify the situation rule 9 b) be amended as follows –

Any match between a county in the East Zone( East Midlands) and a county in the West Zone( West Midlands) shall be arranged at a neutral venue unless otherwise agreed. This will not apply where the counties involved have a common border. In such cases the match will be played in the home county, unless that county agrees otherwise. This rule will apply whether or not a section is split into zones or divisions. (amendments in italics)

This matter was on the November 2005 meeting agenda but could not be formally adopted.

d) That rule 21 be amended with the words in italics below -

21. Grading limits apply at the start of each season and will be taken from the latest national grading list (excluding the rapid play list). A player who has no published grade may participate in any grade restricted tournament providing that there is no doubt in the team captain's mind that the player is not of such a playing strength as to breach the limits set. and the inclusion of that player is cleared with the controller before he/she plays.. A player not cleared prior to competing will be deemed to be an ineligible player and rule 4 will apply Team captains should have recourse to previous grading lists and the advice of their local grader. Any disputes on ungraded players should be referred to the controller for the tournament. Counties may enter more than one team in any grade restricted tournament.  . Where a county has more than one team in any grade restricted tournament, players are not interchangeable and each team must be a completely separate squad.

The clearance of ungraded players echoes the ECF rules. At the moment the MCCU rules give no recourse if a team plays an ungraded player, who is felt by anyone other than the team captain, to be stronger than the grading limit for that section.

 

9) County Correspondence Rules – proposals from the Chief Executive Officer

a) That the MCCU adopt the email rules already used by the ECF for its’ correspondence events amended to reflect MCCU dates & appeals procedure

b) That the revised rules for the Individual Correspondence event be adopted.

– see copy at end of package.

These matters were before the November 2005 meeting & could not be formally voted upon.

10) Proposal: From the Chief Executive Officer

That the MCCU adopt the draft Child Protection Policy placed before it.

Another matter from the November 2005 meeting

11) Any other business:

a) The meeting is invited to discuss developments on ECF membership & other matters.

b) Claim from a previous officer for expenses – an expenses claim has been received from a previous officer for expenses incurred during the 1990’s.  The MCCU Board seeks the views of the meeting on this matter

 

12) Date of the next meeting: