| MCCU Home | MCCU Admin |
1) Apologies
Sean Hewitt, Graham Humphries, David Pardoe,
Julian Clissold, Matthew Pollard.
Attending
Ray Collett & Andrew Farthing (Worcs),
Mick Norris (Manchester), Andrew Leadbetter,
Andrew Davies, Matthew Corr & David
Buckley (Staffs), John Pakenham (Warks),
Peter Gibbs & Cyril & Julie Johnson
(Leics), Chris Gibson (Northants), Simon
Gilmore (Derbys), Peter Sherlock (Lincs).
2) Minutes of the MCCU AGM 2007
2.1) Accuracy
Minutes accepted with no amendments
2.2) Matters Arising.
None that are not addressed in reports.
3) Reports:
3.1) Chairman,
Nothing to report
3.2) Chief Executive
Written report submitted and accepted.
3.3) Secretary (vacant)
3.4) Finance Director
Accounts presented by Andrew Leadbetter
(with signed copy from the auditor provided)
were accepted.
Instructions are awaited regarding the
prize for the Grand Prix which has yet
to be paid out.
Grant from John Robinson Trust for a Junior
event has been carried over to 2008/9 with
the approval of the Trust.
Andrew has explored the options for an account providing a better return for MCCU funds, but has found nothing better available to an organisation of our type. (this matter was raised at the 2007 AGM)
3.5) Director for Junior Chess
A verbal report was passed on by the CEO
on behalf of Graham Humphries. He had
fallen ill just prior to the meeting & was
unable to attend. His own situation recovering
from the loss of his wife & that
of Cyril Johnson in assisting him in
organising events had led to little activity
on the Junior side.
Report accepted.
3.6) Grading Director
A written report was provided & accepted.
3.7) Events Director
The Director Sean Hewitt was unable to
attend due to other commitments. A written
report was provided & accepted. The
report included a request for guidance
regarding awarding of MCCU British Championship
places. 1 more application than places
available had been received, with Nottingham,
Leicester, Warwickshire & Bolton
Congresses all asking for places. The
majority view was that places should
go to congresses already part of the
MCCU Grand Prix. It was also agreed that
the MCCU Board prepare a paper for the
next meeting on policy for future years.
3.8) Public Relations Director,
Due to his own & family health problems & bereavement
Cyril Johnson verbally reported that he
had been able to do little on the Publicity
side.
Report accepted & condolences offered
regarding the loss of his mother.
3.9) County Teams
A written report was provided & accepted.
The issue of teams withdrawing from sections
provoked discussion. Currently a team pulling
out after the fixtures have been published
is not refunded the entry fee. The position
regarding match expenses incurred by the
opposition where a team concedes was clarified – the
rules already provide for those expenses
to be recovered from the opposing team.
There was a suggestion that in sections
with 8 teams, where it was felt there was
a danger of a withdrawal, all play all
fixtures should be scheduled. It was explained
that it would be impractical to schedule
fixtures for all play all for more than
7 teams in the time frame available. It
was then suggested that further sanctions
should be available for use against defaulting
teams and a motion was passed with only
2 dissenting votes, “that MCCU rules
mirror the ECF County rules on this area” i.e.
a team may be fined up to £50. The
important point being that “may” allows
the particular circumstances in each case
to be considered.
The split of the open teams into championship & minor
was also discussed. The SCCU had questioned
the number of ECF places to which the MCCU
were entitled, viewing the Championship
section as the number of open teams. Cyril
Johnson strongly refuted this suggestion,
all the teams competing had no grading
restrictions i.e. were open teams. The
Minor section was not run on the same lines
as the ECF Minor & in fact all Unions
had the right to nominate 2 teams to the
ECF Minor without running a qualifying
event. It was pointed out that some of
the open teams in fact had no players over
175.The possibility of such Open teams
having the option of being nominated to
the U175 section at ECF level, if as expected
no U175 event was held, was also discussed & felt
to be feasible.
Staffordshire explained that they had been
unaware of the play-off for 3rd place in
the U100 section, as a result their 2 teams
had not played. The website was incorrect
in recording the position as a 12-0 default.
3.10) Correspondence Chess:
3.10.1) Individual Event
A written report was provided. On the matter
of lack of publicity of details on the
website the CEO added that the webmaster
had reported these detail had not been
received by him.
The event for 2008/9 already has more entries
then 2007/8, but the CEO reminded all present
that the rules were changed last year to
allow wider entry & do provide for
more than 12 entries. If anyone wished
to enter there was still time to do so.
She would be putting a message out via
the MCCU Newsgroup to that effect.
3.10.2) Team Event
Fewer counties had a correspondence captain
and teams were proving difficult to raise
even for the National Counties Correspondence
competition. It was therefore concluded
that there was insufficient interest to
run this event.
3.11) MCCU Webmaster
No report received
3.12) ECF
A written report
was received & accepted.
There was some debate, speculation & difference
of opinion regarding the merits of the
Directors who resigned following the April
Council meeting & why they had resigned.
The
meeting echoed the sentiments of the report
in decrying poor communication, particularly
when the outgoing ECF CEO had flagged up
improved communications as a key area.
A number of delegates stressed the need
for greater transparency on ECF matters
and clarity on issues such as the PIF.
There were also some who felt that the
ECF accounts were incomprehensible to the
majority of delegates. It was pointed out
that company law dictated content and layout
to a certain extent, and some felt they
needed the current level of detail.
The Events Director had raised the issue
of limiting the number of proxies any one
delegate could bring to an ECF Council.
The meeting did not feel it was appropriate
to pass any motion on this matter as they
had not had the opportunity to discuss
this at county level. However, Cyril Johnson
indicated that this was an area of concern
for him & that as an ECF Director it
was open to him to put a motion forward.
Information on the new grading structure
was sought by some delegates, Chris Gibson
was able to outline the basics.(more information
may be found in the ECF April Council minutes
on the ECF website) It was confirmed that
the “old” style gradings would
be used for ECF events, it was for individual
counties, congresses and the like to decide
whether to use the old or new style grades
for their events.
3.13) Non-executives
Chris Gibson had
nothing to report & no
report had been received from Gordon Christie.
4) Elections:
4.1)
President – Peter Gibbs elected
unopposed – post vacant in 2007/8
4.2) Chairman – Cyril
Johnson re-elected unopposed
4.3) Chief Executive – Julie
Johnson re-elected unopposed
4.4) Secretary – no
nominations
4.5) Finance Director – Andrew
Leadbetter re-elected unopposed
4.6) Director for
Junior Chess – Graham
Humphries re-elected unopposed
4.7) Director for
Grading – Peter
Sherlock – re-elected unopposed
4.8) Director for
Events – Sean Hewitt – re-elected
unopposed
4.9) Director for
Public Relations – Ray
Collett – elected unopposed
4.10)
Webmaster – Sean Hewitt – re-elected
unopposed
4.11) ECF Delegate – The
Union is now entitled to only 1 delegate
instead of 2 – it was agreed that
this should be the CEO Julie Johnson
4.12) Non-executives (max.2) – Chris
Gibson was re-elected, Andrew Farthing
elected as the only 2 nominees.
5) Appointment of the Auditor.
Roger Butter was re-appointed
6) Levy for 2006/7, Finance Director
Andrew Leadbetter
proposed no change – this
was accepted & the budget agreed
with the removal of insurance premium,
cover is not felt to be needed whilst
the Union runs no congresses.
7) Chess in schools initiative (discussion item)
The announcement of the initiative by the ECF Marketing Director & an extract of the report on the recent ECF Board meeting relating to this subject had been circulated to delegates. The CEO stressed the potential opportunity presented by considerable number of children learning to play chess & suggested that the MCCU should get involved in drawing interested parties together to explore how to take this forward, rather than leaving counties to work in isolation, or worse still do nothing. Some delegates were unaware of the background to the provision of free sets & boards, this was summarised by the CEO. Some delegates were under the impression that schools would be forced to purchase specific material from specific sources, this is in fact not the case. Any school applying for 10 sets & boards will get them with no strings attached. It was agreed that Ray Collett, & Cyril & Julie Johnson would take the matter of MCCU involvement forward.
8) Midland club events (discussion item)
The Events Director had asked for some feedback on interest in an MCCU club tournament, and ideas on format. There was some concern that with existing county fixtures and congresses there was little room in the calendar for such an event. However, some felt that a 1 day event might be feasible with say 2 games am & pm.
9) Any other business
The situation with the inter-county events next year was queried, both in terms of who would act as controller and approach to scheduling dates. The CEO explained that she had offered to act as controller if there was no suitable alternative. As the Events Director was not present the query on scheduling dates could not be answered.
11) Date/place of next meeting
It was agreed that the next meeting be held in the West Midlands – probably Birmingham area. It was also agreed that unless the CEO saw a particular need for a meeting ahead of the 2009 AGM, this would be the next meeting. The requirement for at least 2 meetings a year stated in the current constitution, to be amended accordingly. The 3rd Sunday in June 2009 is the preferred date for the AGM. It is of course open to counties to request a meeting to address a specific issue or issues.
The meeting closed at 6.00pm
| Back to top | MCCU Home | MCCU Admin |